Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Good price?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked

dylan1234

  • dylan1234 user photo
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 241 posts
  • Joined: 05-August 11

Posted 29 March 2013 - 02:34 PM ( #1 )

Do you guys think the price for the tamagotchi lot is reasonable??

Here's the link
http://www.ebay.com/...984.m1426.l2649

Replies

4

Views

215

Started

29 Mar 2013

Last Post

30 Mar 2013

*Hayden*

  • hayden user photo
  • Group: TamaTalk Lifetime Angelgotchi
  • Posts: 1,409 posts
  • Joined: 02-March 13

Posted 29 March 2013 - 02:36 PM ( #2 )

if you had the money, then maybe



indiGOtama

  • indigotama user photo
  • Group: TamaTalk Lifetime Angelgotchi
  • Posts: 163 posts
  • Joined: 14-March 08

Posted 29 March 2013 - 02:52 PM ( #3 )

I think that, with where the bidding is at right now ($71), that is a pretty good price. When you take into consideration that each one of those tamas would be $20+ on their own, that is absolutely a great deal.

 

Also to take into consideration, though (and this would be a deal breaker for me), is that 6 of the 14 tamas do not have battery covers! But then, I am very particular about my tamas, and some people might not care at all. 

 

You also need to take into consideration that you are getting a bunch of the same thing - mostly v3, a v1 and v2, and a v4. Personally, in my collection, I strive to have as much variety as possible, but if you really like v3's, then that works. 

 

Also, they seem to have put stickers on a few of the shells. Personally, I am not bothered by a little bit of customization, but when it starts to look tacky, I stop liking it. This doesn't look too bad to me, though. It would definitely be something I would only do if I had a couple "regular", non-stickered shells of the same version, though. 

 

Just my thoughts. Hope that helped!  ^_^


Edited by indiGOtama, 29 March 2013 - 02:57 PM.

  • Moussette likes this

Franny Samba

  • franny-samba user photo
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 65 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 13

Posted 30 March 2013 - 06:28 PM ( #4 )

I had a look, and it's not bad. The main deal breaker is the fact 6 of them are without a back cover. This may point to neglect so they could be covered in scratches and cracks.

dylan1234

  • dylan1234 user photo
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 241 posts
  • Joined: 05-August 11

Posted 30 March 2013 - 08:26 PM ( #5 )

I got them :)