Thank you TamaMum! I would probably have started explaining once again, but your post really says it all right.
(However, I'm not over 18 yet).
Thank you very much for the great effort you put in that post!
Hey Stefan! I went back and read your other replies, as suggested by TamaMama, and I'd like to say that I now understand why you consider it to be "immoral". I don't agree with you, but I understand where you're coming from. And since you are religious, and therefore all your morality is based on the fact that you believe in God, there is no point in debating this with you - so I say, in this case, we must agree to disagree. I also understand, from your comments, that you feel it is your duty to convince others that it is immoral, and I also can see that it is bothering people, however, unfortunately, if you believe that is your duty, then of course you have to do it.
I saw comments that said you do this out of love for those who are gay, to protect them from the harm they can possibly cause themselves, and if that is the TRUE motive behind your opinions, that's very noble of you.
But while I'd LIKE to just leave this as it is, and not bother you any more about this, there are a few things that I saw you say that I just have to discuss.
You said: "I'm convinced that it won't take long anymore before pedophiles will be excepted(or at least much less punished), since it's "natural". "
...So you're saying, pretty much, that you don't see a difference between consensual sex between two adults, and the rape of a child? One is clearly harmful, both physically and mentally, to a CHILD, the other is an act agreed upon by two adults.
I know that child rape is not always punished by the Catholic church,
in fact, it is often covered up, and the priest who has done the act is actually protected by the higher-ups. However, that does not mean that this act is as harmless as consensual gay sex between adults - I'm disturbed by the fact that you think these two acts are the same (or that you think people who are OK with gay sex are therefore OK with child rape - This makes no sense.)
You said: "I still can change to gay, if I really want, so you people can too."
This is just not true. Does the idea of gay sex, sex with another man, turn you on? Do you desire to have sex with another man? Or does this idea disgust you? If you desire to have sex with another man, if you think that you COULD have sex with another man, that means that you are already gay, to some extent. I'm assuming you would never want a man to have sex with you, and that seeing other men does not "turn you on", which means that you are STRAIGHT. You can't just flip a switch in your brain and suddenly be turned on by other men. Just like a GAY MAN can't flip a switch and suddenly be attracted to FEMALES. Some males simply CAN NOT GET AN ERECTION while thinking about or seeing a female. Females DISGUST some males, and this is what makes them gay.
And don't get me wrong, I think certain people can slowly, over time, change in their sexual preference. So SOME PEOPLE who wish to be "right" by their religion can be "changed" through therapy. But some others simply are hardwired to love only those of their same sex. And if you do not know this to be true, you simply haven't been exposed to truly gay people - you know only what your religion has taught you about gay people, which you may consider fact, but science disagrees.
...I just needed to comment on those two things.
I'm glad to see that the majority of the people who commented here are tolerant of homosexuality though - even those who are religious! This makes me hopeful for a less judgmental future.
Again, if something is against your religion, by all means, do not do it!
But you can't use YOUR religion as a basis to make laws for ALL people.